Keep on working, great job!

водопонижение иглофильтрами грунтовых вод [url=https://iglofiltry-vodoponizhenie.ru/]водопонижение иглофильтрами грунтовых вод[/url] .

CBS News editor in chief Bari Weiss decided to shelve a planned “60 Minutes” story titled “Inside CECOT,” creating an uproar inside CBS, but the report has reached a worldwide audience anyway.
[url=https://minexchange.net]mine шахта[/url]
On Monday, some Canadian viewers noticed that the pre-planned “60 Minutes” episode was published on a streaming platform owned by Global TV, the network that has the rights to “60 Minutes” in Canada.
[url=https://minexchange.net]mine шахта[/url]
The preplanned episode led with correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi’s story — the one that Weiss stopped from airing in the US because she said it was “not ready.”
[url=https://minexchange.net]mine шахта[/url]
Several Canadian viewers shared clips and summaries of the story on social media, and within hours, the videos went viral on platforms like Reddit and Bluesky.

“Watch fast,” one of the Canadian viewers wrote on Bluesky, predicting that CBS would try to have the videos taken offline.

Related article
The Free Press' Honestly with Bari Weiss (pictured) hosts Senator Ted Cruz presented by Uber and X on January 18, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Inside the Bari Weiss decision that led to a ‘60 Minutes’ crisis

Progressive Substack writers and commentators blasted out the clips and urged people to share them. “This could wind up being the most-watched newsmagazine segment in television history,” the high-profile Trump antagonist George Conway commented on X.

A CBS News spokesperson had no immediate comment on the astonishing turn of events.

Alfonsi’s report was weeks in the making. Weiss screened it for the first time last Thursday night. The story was finalized on Friday, according to CBS sources, and was announced in a press release that same day.

On Saturday morning, Weiss began to change her mind about the story and raised concerns about its content, including the lack of responses from the relevant Trump administration officials.

But networks like CBS sometimes deliver taped programming to affiliates like Global TV ahead of time. That appears to be what happened in this case: The Friday version of the “60 Minutes” episode is what streamed to Canadian viewers.

The inadvertent Canadian stream is “the best thing that could have happened,” a CBS source told CNN on Monday evening, arguing that the Alfonsi piece is “excellent” and should have been televised as intended.

People close to Weiss have argued that the piece was imbalanced, however, because it did not include interviews with Trump officials.

Weiss told staffers on Monday, “We need to be able to get the principals on the record and on camera.” However, in an earlier memo to colleagues, Alfonsi asserted that her team tried, and their “refusal to be interviewed” was “a tactical maneuver designed to kill the story.”

At the end of the segment that streamed on Global TV’s platform, Alfonsi said Homeland Security “declined our request for an interview and referred all questions about CECOT to El Salvador. The government there did not respond to our request.”

The segment included sound bites from President Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. But it was clearly meant to be a story about Venezuelan men deported to El Salvador, not about the officials who implemented Trump’s mass deportation policy.
mine.exchange
https://minexchange.net

Нейросети для учебы <a href="https://ya.4bb.ru/viewtopic.php?id=6216#p22768">https://ya.4b
b.ru/viewtopic.php?id=6216#p22768</a> .
И еще вот - <a href=https://siforum.borda.ru/?1-7-0-00000273-000-0-0-1765532425>https://sifo
rum.borda.ru/?1-7-0-00000273-000-0-0-1765532425</a> .

внедрение 1c <a href=https://1s-vnedrenie.ru/>внедрение 1c</a> .

водопонижение иглофильтрами <a href=https://vodoponijenie-iglofiltrami.ru/>водопонижение иглофильтрами</a> .

оптимизация наружки <a href=https://reklamnyj-kreativ1.ru/>reklamnyj-kreativ1.ru</a> .

I just like the helpful information you supply for your articles. I will bookmark your blog and take a look at again right here frequently. I am rather certain I'll be informed many new stuff right right here! Best of luck for the following!

Для меня выбор краски для внутренних работ — это не про «какая подешевле», а про комфорт и результат на годы. Я смотрю на состав, укрывистость, износостойкость и то, как краска ведёт себя в реальных условиях: легко ли наносится, не пахнет ли резко, можно ли мыть стены без следов. Важно и то, как цвет выглядит при разном освещении — тестирую образцы заранее и не полагаюсь только на палитру.
Со временем я поняла, что качественная краска экономит и время, и нервы: меньше слоёв, аккуратный финиш и отсутствие переделок. Внутренние работы — это про пространство, в котором живёшь каждый день, поэтому компромиссы здесь неуместны.
А вы при выборе краски ориентируетесь на цену или на то, как она будет работать в вашем интерьере?
Если будет много полезных ответов — соберу мини-гайд о том какой должна быть <a href=https://mymoscow.forum24.ru/?1-6-0-00035857-000-0-0-1764144905>крас�
�а для пола</a>

I always emailed this blog post page to all my associates, because if like to read it next my contacts will too.